Jos? Galindo
2004-08-26 18:55:14 UTC
Hellow there againg:
I am adding a comment on apocryphal gospels,
speaking of apocryphal gospels, to be honest, i think that the gospel
of Philip (x) and the gospel of Thomas (x) should have been included
in the books of the Bible,
and i say to those that may compare this statement of mine as if i
were saying "Bible is not enough" "Bible is incomplete" "Bible is not
an authority" i say Bible books are valid and an authority; but a
single page of a gospel is also valid but is not the complete gospel
and not enough, and a group of books of the Bible are valid but are
not the complete set of books (the complete Bible) and not enough, and
as real as this is that it is necessary not one page but all pages in
a gospel for it to be better understood, then it is necesary not one
book but all the books (the books of the diciples of Jesus) in the
Bible for it to be better understood , i must remind those against my
idea, that the Bible did not choose the canon members.
And as it may have happened to the canon members (y),
( -- I think God allowed that to happen, for those secrets (x) to be
revealed in the end times - the time of the redeemed of Jehovah - The
redeemed from death - )
It will also happen to some others :
Daniel 12
12:8 And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what
[shall be] the end of these [things]?
12:9 And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words [are] closed up
and sealed (x) till the time of the end.
12:10 Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the
wicked shall do wickedly: and none (y) of the wicked shall understand;
but the wise shall understand.
--
Here :
Jose Galindo
http://danielxii.tripod.com/
http://geocities.com/balconcillofc/
Email : ***@hotmail.com
Lima, August 26, 2004
I am adding a comment on apocryphal gospels,
speaking of apocryphal gospels, to be honest, i think that the gospel
of Philip (x) and the gospel of Thomas (x) should have been included
in the books of the Bible,
and i say to those that may compare this statement of mine as if i
were saying "Bible is not enough" "Bible is incomplete" "Bible is not
an authority" i say Bible books are valid and an authority; but a
single page of a gospel is also valid but is not the complete gospel
and not enough, and a group of books of the Bible are valid but are
not the complete set of books (the complete Bible) and not enough, and
as real as this is that it is necessary not one page but all pages in
a gospel for it to be better understood, then it is necesary not one
book but all the books (the books of the diciples of Jesus) in the
Bible for it to be better understood , i must remind those against my
idea, that the Bible did not choose the canon members.
And as it may have happened to the canon members (y),
( -- I think God allowed that to happen, for those secrets (x) to be
revealed in the end times - the time of the redeemed of Jehovah - The
redeemed from death - )
It will also happen to some others :
Daniel 12
12:8 And I heard, but I understood not: then said I, O my Lord, what
[shall be] the end of these [things]?
12:9 And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words [are] closed up
and sealed (x) till the time of the end.
12:10 Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the
wicked shall do wickedly: and none (y) of the wicked shall understand;
but the wise shall understand.
--
Here :
Jose Galindo
http://danielxii.tripod.com/
http://geocities.com/balconcillofc/
Email : ***@hotmail.com
Lima, August 26, 2004